The Business of PIV Disputes
Track 1 — Legal Spend Management: Best Practices for Budgeting Pharmaceutical IP Litigation – Monitoring Legal Spend and Balancing the Budget
Track 2 — Revisiting Damages in an At-Risk Launch Scenario: Questions of Remedies and Valuation
Track 1
Track 2

Peter Waibel
Head, Patent Litigation (US)
Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation

Douglas H. Carsten
Partner
McDermott Will & Emery

Andrew Cochran
Attorney
Cahill Gordon & Reindel LLP

Vikram Mathrani
Partner
Honigman LLP

Ted Mathias
Partner
Axinn, Veltrop & Harkrider LLP
Track 1 — Legal Spend Management: Best Practices for Budgeting Pharmaceutical IP Litigation – Monitoring Legal Spend and Balancing the Budget
- Accounting for inflation and implementing practices to minimize surprises and increase predictability
- Forecasting the budget by phase and quarter
- Strategies for reevaluating the use of task codes
- Deciding what components should be incorporated into the budget
- Vendors
- Experts
- Understanding the source of error when unforeseen events or overages occur
- Evaluating the appropriateness of alternative fee arrangements
Track 2 — Revisiting Damages in an At-Risk Launch Scenario: Questions of Remedies and Valuation
- Exploring questions of royalties, lost profits, and exceptional findings
- Market reconstruction considerations
- Alternatives for noninfringement
- Examining the value of the use of the patented technology
- Examining grounds for mitigation
- Considering the practical consequences of the Supreme Court’s WesternGeco decision on Hatch- Waxman damages awards
- Exploring when U.S. patent owners may recover foreign lost profits tied to domestic acts of infringement under § 271(f)(2)
- Examining cases where the relevant infringing conduct occurred in the United States