Agenda
Flip through our conference brochure and discover what’s new this year.
Download Brochure
Pre-Conference Workshops
April 21, 2026
Day 1 – Main Conference
April 22, 2026
Registration and Morning Coffee
Year In Review: A Closer Look at the Impact of the America First Investment Policy, CFIUS Fast-Track Process, and Transactions Involving Parties from Allied Countries

David FeithSenior Fellow, Technology TradeHudson InstituteFormer Deputy Assistant Secretary of State
U.S. Department of State

Leyton NelsonDeputy Director, Office of Investment SecurityU.S. Department of the Treasury

Timothy VarleyDirector, DON Foreign Investment Review, Assistant Secretary of the Navy for Research, Development, and Acquisition (RD&A)U.S. Department of the Navy

Joshua R. ThompsonAssociatePaul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP
This session will look at the America First Investment Policy, as part of the National Security Presidential Memorandum (NSPM) issued in February 2025, proposing to rework the inbound and outbound investment screening process for allied countries. In tandem with the policy, the U.S. Department of the Treasury launched the Known Investor Portal, where CFIUS can collect information from foreign investors. During this session, we will unpack the practical, real-world impact of these key policy shifts:
- How the Fast Track Process and the Known Investor pilot program are working in practice: How many deals are approved and is the process working as planned?
- Is there an increase or decrease in clearances, blocks and the number of transactions being reviewed?
- Assessing whether agreements are more (or less) complex and transparent
- The role of the third-party monitor model within the fast-track process
- The status of the America First Investment Policy and rulemaking from government departments
- Determining whether those in the pilot project will become ‘trusted’ and if these companies will become public
Networking Break
The Finer Points of Advising Clients on Mitigation Agreements – from Negotiation to Compliance and Enforcement

Scott BoylanPartnerStoneTurn

James M. BrowerPartnerMorrison Foerster LLP

Renée LatourPartnerClifford Chance LLP

Nicholas JacksonChiefForeign Investment Unit Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)

John C. RoodCEO and ChairmanMomentus SpaceFormer Under Secretary of Defense for Policy, U.S. Department of Defense
This session will examine the new realities affecting the negotiation of mitigation agreements and advising clients -from front-end review by CFIUS to ongoing compliance.
Topics of discussion will include:
- The new frontier of strategic dealmaking, where CFIUS is one component
- New challenges affecting the negotiation process for mitigation process
- Deciding whether to address the operational side when negotiating a mitigation agreement
- Balancing CFIUS security priorities with business efficiency and profitability
- Frequency of reporting obligations
- Trends in mitigation agreements and why they are terminated-and how
- The extent to which mitigation agreements vary depending on the countries and entities involved
- Monitoring compliance and enforcement obligations, including independent monitors, audits and reporting requirements
EMERGING SECTORS UNDER THE NATIONAL SECURITY UMBRELLA – Part One
Analyzing CFIUS Reviews of Transactions in Critical Technology, AI and Quantum Computing Dual Use

Alex MillsRegulatory Specialist

Mark B. SkerryPartnerSimpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP

Brad WilsonManaging DirectorBerkeley Research Group, LLC (BRG)

Stephenie Gosnell HandlerPartnerGibson Dunn & Crutcher LLP
This session will focus on the rapidly evolving landscape of transactions in critical technology, Artificial Intelligence and Quantum Computing contexts.
Key topics include:
- The changing scope of national security risks of transactions involving emerging technology, including dual-use tech
- The extent to which policy, compliance and security are keeping up with swift tech innovation and advancement
- Examining the tech capability of other countries and how the US compares
- How the US government is adopting and using AI as a tool for CFIUS
Networking Luncheon
Sponsored by


Charles MorrisonNational Security Advisor Sen. Jim Banks (R-IN)

Hrishikesh N. HariPartner, Co-Chair, National SecurityDechert LLP
The New Frontier of Outbound Investment Screening, Posture on China and Tariff Reciprocity-and the Interplay with CFIUS: Key Takeaways for the Path Forward

Ed BrzytwaVice President of International TradeConsumer Technology Association

Maia NikoladzeAssociate Director, Economic Statecraft Initiative, GeoEconomics CenterAtlantic Council

Jennifer L. SlaterDirector, Associate General Counsel, AFC Legal AmericasDeutsche Bank AG

Adam VaccaroPartnerDLA Piper LLPFormer Director of the Office of Investment Security in the International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce

Catherine HeinPartnerA&O Shearman LLP
This session will examine the Outbound Investment Security Program, following the final rule which came into effect in January 2025, and how it intersects with investments in China. We will also look at the proposed Foreign Investment Guardrails to Help Thwart (FIGHT) China Act that seeks to restrict American investments in certain sensitive Chinese technology and military sectors.
- Examining how the legislation is being interpreted, and how regulators will be enforcing the law
- Delineating the differences and overlap between CFIUS and the Outbound Screening process
- Impact of new, expanded restrictions on U.S. outbound investment in China for sensitive technologies, including semiconductors, artificial intelligence, quantum, biotechnology, aerospace, and more,
- Case Study review of the Trump Administration’s response to China’s Military-Civil Fusion (MCF) strategy
- A closer look at the effects of tariffs on CFIUS transactions and dealmaking between foreign partners
Networking Break
AFIDA and the Evolving CFIUS Focus on Transactions involving Agricultural Land, Critical Infrastructure and Military Installations

Chase D. KanieckiPartnerCleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP

Ruchi G. GillCounselLatham & Watkins LLP

Antonia TzinovaPartnerWeil, Gotshal & Manges LLP

Keith SchomigPartnerPaul Hastings LLP
This session will look at the Agricultural Foreign Investment Disclosure Act (AFIDA) which requires foreign persons to disclose their interests in U.S. agricultural land to the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA).
Topics will include:
- Statutory jurisdiction and the overlap with sanctions
- Non-notified transactions, monitoring and compliance
- Case studies including:
- Foreign Ownership of U.S. Real Property: Developments in Shen v. Simpson, before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, (2024)
- Contrasting the approved deal between Belgium-based company Agristo and the City of Grand Forks, North Dakota with the blocked deal involving Fufeng Group
CASE STUDIES
How the TikTok and Nippon Steel Deals Have Changed the Future of CFIUS Filings, Reviews and Mitigation

Sarah Bauerle DanzmanAssociate Professor of International Studies, Hamilton Lugar School of Global and International Studies & Senior FellowAtlantic Council

Evan SillsPartnerKirkland & Ellis LLPFormer Attorney Advisor, U.S. Department of Justice

Shannon ReavesPartner
Co-chair, National Security practiceDechert LLP
This session will dissect the Tik Tok transaction, including the U.S. Supreme Court decision on whether the Tik Tok should be banned, and the Protecting America from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act (2025), which aims to regulate “foreign adversary controlled applications” specifically those operated by TikTok and other subsidiary of its China-based parent company, ByteDance Ltd., on national security grounds. We will also take a closer look at the acquisition of United States Steel Corporation by the Nippon Steel Company, the CFIUS implications and the mitigation measures put in place.
- Unpacking CFIUS’ approach to TikTok and Nippon Steel
- What these two transactions reveal about the present and future of CFIUS reviews across sectors
- Key mitigation measures put into place and how they stand apart
- Examining the process of determining an appropriate U.S. owner
- Addressing security concerns with a look at the Texas Project and Oracle as a minority owner

Ben JoseloffPartnerDavis Polk & Wardwell LLPFormer Senior Counsel & CFIUS Lead Counsel
U.S. Department of the Treasury

Pierce ScrantonDeputy Head North America/Managing DirectorTemasek International

Bridget McGovernVP Legal, TradeCoherent Corp
- How companies account for the costs of the transaction and mitigation
- Key considerations for planning at the pre-CFIUS filing and negotiations
- How organizations are working effectively with outside counsel
- Building positive relationships between industry and government
- Meeting privacy obligations for personal information of U.S citizens
- Managing Cyber Security and Insider Threats at the operational level
- Implementing policy and process formation, and standard operating procedures for oversight, auditing and monitoring of both systems and teams
Closing Remarks from the Conference Co-Chair and End of Day One
Networking Cocktail Reception Sponsored by

Day 2 – Main Conference
April 23, 2026
Registration and Morning Coffee
The Next Phase of the Export Controls and CFIUS Interplay: Contrasting Supply Chain Risks for Dual-Use and Military Items, Data and Technologies – and the Impact on the Deal

Ivan A. Schlager, P.C.PartnerKirkland & Ellis

Steven KlemencicManaging DirectorBerkeley Research Group LLC (BRG)

Giovanna CinnelliCounsellorU.S. Department of State
This session will offer a side-by-side comparison of export v. CFIUS controls. Examine the similar and differing perspectives on national security risks and how to address them.
Topics will include:
- Identifying deeply buried supply chain risk from the export controls and CFIUS vantage points
- Examining commercial-use artificial intelligence and the multiple levels of risk
- Combatting nefariously re-labeled products as “made in the US”
- How intensifying export enforcement and compliance risks are affecting CFIUS reviews and mitigation requirements
Taking Stock of the Trump Administration’s New Policies on CFIUS and National Security – From Sovereign Wealth Funds to Deal Prohibition

Jared RoscoeDeputy General Counsel and Senior Advisor for Government Affairs, SoftBank Group InternationalSoftBank Group InternationalFormer Senior Advisor for Domestic Finance
U.S. Department of the Treasury

Malcolm (Mick) J. TuesleyPartnerSimpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP
Through a series of case studies, this session will review how the Trump Administration is enacting new policies are affecting the national security sector in general and CFIUS process specifically. Speakers will discuss the nuances of each transaction and the scope of Presidential involvement.
Case Study #1:
In a seldom-seen action, President Trump published an order prohibiting the acquisition of Delaware company Jupiter Systems, LLC by Suirui International Co. The July 2025 order directed Suirui to divest all interest in Jupiter.
Case Study #2:
Saudi Arabia’s sovereign wealth fund, Public Investment Fund (PIF), as part of a consortium of investors, acquired California-based video game studio Electronic Arts (EA).
Break
Update on Golden Shares and U.S. Partnerships in Dealmaking-and What They Mean for CFIUS and the Broader M&A Landscape

Nancy FischerPartnerPillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP

Nathan MitchellPartner Holland & Knight LLP
This session will look at how U.S. Government partnerships and how the use of “golden shares” as a tool is being used in mergers and acquisitions, including how this change is facilitating the deal-making process and whether this process can be expected for future deal-making.
- Examining the economic versus security obligations of the deal
- Characterizing the U.S. government as holding a “golden share” in the agreement
- Enabling a U.S. government “veto power” to not move facilities oversees, and committing to maintain U.S. production capacity
- Aftermath of the U.S. Department of Defense (15%) $400 million investment in convertible preferred shares of MP Materials – part of an effort to rebuild its domestic rare earth supply chain
- Reviewing how golden shares have been used in other countries, with a look at the Netherlands government “golden shares” agreements with telecommunications company KPN NV and postal company TPG NV
- How negotiations have changed M&A when the government is taking an active role

Jill McCluneGeneral Counsel USAvon Protection Systems

Matt BorronExecutive DirectorAssociation of Defense Communities

B.J. AltvaterAssociateCleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP
- Reviewing key proposed and passed legislation and how national security is viewed by state government, with a look at Nevada, Florida, Mississippi and Texas
- Monitoring Congress’ response to proposed and passed state-level legislation
- Examining the impact on national security when a state does not have CFIUS-like regulations
- Examining who has jurisdiction, and how to deconflict – where CFIUS has/wants authority
Networking Luncheon
Sponsored by

International FDI Regimes: Comparing and Contrasting the Investments Security Regimes of Foreign Countries

Jennifer Danner RiccardiSenior AdvisorDelegation of the European Union

DeNeige DojackSenior Director, Investment Review, Foreign Investment Review and Economic Security (FIRES) BranchInnovation, Science and Economic Development, Government of Canada

Jill McCluneGeneral Counsel USAvon Protection Systems
This session is held under the Chatham House Rule, which means participants are free to use the information received, but neither the identity nor the affiliation of the speaker(s), nor that of any other participant, may be revealed.
This session will examine how allied countries approach investment security, where policies align with the United States, and where they differ. Discussion topics will include:
- Global trends for investing
- Best practices for sharing information
- Approaching multinational deals
- Examining the definition of “national security” and evaluating risk
European Union: Open Strategic Autonomy
- Trade outside the EU as an exclusive responsibility of the EU and not its member countries
- Open Strategic Autonomy it builds on the EU’s openness to contribute to the economic recovery
Canada: Investment Canada Act (2024)
- Foreign investments in the critical minerals sector as a national security concern
- Determining whether an investment is of “net benefit,” such as the effect on economics
Networking Break

Amanda BlairDeputy DirectorU.S. Department of the Treasury

John P. CarlinPartnerPaul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP
Assistant Attorney General for National Security
U.S. Department of Justice

Alexis J. EarlyPartnerBryan Cave Leighton Paisner LLP

Aristidis KourkoumelisAssistant Secretary for Trade and Economic SecurityU.S. Department of Homeland Security

Jennifer TharpSupervisory Intelligence Analyst, Foreign Investment UnitFederal Bureau of Investigation
This session will look at what sectors and types of transactions are now a priority for CFIUS, and what has changed I the past 12 months:
- Identifying transactions that should be reported, but are not
- Analyzing the policy changes pertaining to non-notified transactions
- What the FBI are bringing forward as a concern
- The evolving role of law enforcement and the intelligence community in identifying non-notified
- Tools and authority under CFIUS to advance covered transactions and reporting
- Key lessons in participating in the non-notified process
EMERGING SECTORS FOR NATIONAL SECURUTY – Part Two
BioTech and Personal Sensitive Data as Bigger “Red Flags”

Paul D. MarquardtPartnerDavis Polk & Wardell LLP
BioTech, personal sensitive information and patient data has emerged as one of the biggest national security concerns for the United States. Congress introduced the National Biotechnology Initiative Act, in September 2025 with an aim to advance national security and economic productivity. This session will address how the U.S. approach to biotech will affect CFIUS reviews.
Topics will include:
- Which sectors pose security risks and why
- Maintaining U.S.’ innovation and competitive edge in the biotech sector
- Defining “Personal Sensitive Data” under the EO and how the definition may evolve in practice
- Restricting access by “countries of concern” to Americans’ bulk sensitive personal data




