Insights on the Future of §112: Satisfying the Requirements of Enablement and Written Description under Amgen v. Sanofi
Mary C. Till
Senior Legal Advisor
Office of Patent Legal Administration
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
Jason Murata
Partner
Axinn, Veltrop & Harkrider LLP
Emily Larrimer Savas
Partner
Locke Lord LLP
Emer Simic
Partner
Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP
- Analyzing the Supreme Court’s decision in Amgen v. Sanofi relative to the enablement requirement
- Taking stock of what the decision means when a patent claims a class of novel compounds or antibodies
- Understanding the impact of the decision on the ability to protect broader foundational innovations
- Reviewing the impact of other influential §112 cases, such as Juno, Biogen and Idenix
- Reconciling whether patentees must disclose enough information to “enable” people of ordinary skill in the relevant art to “reach the full scope” of a claimed invention
- Assessing how the decision could make changes to the Federal Circuit’s approach
- Implementing best practices for patent prosecution in view of the Court’s decision