2024 Agenda
Flip through our conference brochure and discover what’s new this year.
Download Brochure
Day 1
May 30, 2024
Julia HatcherPartnerLatham & Watkins LLP
Kegan BrownPartnerLowenstein Sandler LLP
Our esteemed co-chairs will set the stage for the conference with a high-level exploration of the most significant policy initiatives, regulatory movements, and litigation developments in the realm of PFAS to date.
David UhlmannAssistant Administrator
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance (OECA)
In our opening session, the EPA will share insights on the latest strides being taken by the Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance to implement the agency’s PFAS Strategic Roadmap. They will provide key updates on what the OECA has been doing to address PFAS exposure as part of the agency’s National Enforcement and Compliance Initiatives, and what is next on the horizon.
Morning Coffee Break
Analyzing the Profound Implications of a PFAS “Hazardous Substance” Designation Under CERCLA: Critical Considerations for All PFAS Stakeholders
Kegan BrownPartnerLowenstein Sandler LLP
Stephanie FeingoldPartnerMorgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP
The EPA has estimated that their final rule designating PFAS as hazardous substance will be coming in February 2024. This CERCLA designation will have critical implications for manufacturers of PFAS and PFAS-containing products, owners/operators of properties or facilities where PFAS was released or disposed, and other various entities. This panel will closely examine topics including:
- Analyzing the EPA’s final rule designating PFAS as a “hazardous substance” under CERCLA
- Examining the status of the final rule, projected timelines and Congressional responses
- Assessing the implications of a CERCLA designation for owners/operators of properties or facilities where PFAS chemicals were released or disposed
- Understanding the full scope of liability implications for “Potentially Responsible Parties” (PRPs), including:
- Manufacturers and importers of PFAS chemicals
- Businesses that use or manufacture products containing PFAS
- Entities that have generated, transported or arranged for the disposal of PFAS chemicals
- Waste management and wastewater facilities that treat PFAS contamination
- Assessing the circumstances under which “Potentially Responsible Parties” may be found responsible under CERCLA and potential ways to minimize liability
Examining Recent Developments Under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA): What Every Counsel for a Manufacturer/Importer of PFAS Must Know About the Latest EPA Reporting Requirements and Upcoming “New Use Rule”
Julia HatcherPartnerLatham & Watkins LLP
Gwen Keyes FlemingPartner
Co-Chair, Environmental Practice GroupDLA Piper
David FotouhiPartnerGibson, Dunn & Crutcher
Cynthia AM StromanPartnerKing & Spalding LLP
- Examining the new Final Rule requiring the reporting of PFAS data to the EPA
- Addressing the full scope of the inventory, recordkeeping and reporting requirements for companies that have manufactured or imported PFAS or PFAS-containing products since 2011
- Navigating the challenges of obtaining and reporting accurate information pertaining to: chemical identity, uses, volumes made and processed, byproducts emitted, environmental and health effects, worker exposure, and disposal to EPA
- Examining the 41 new additional PFAS chemicals that the final rule identifies as concerning and deems subject to the new reporting requirements
- Understanding EPA’s newly released framework for addressing “new and new uses of PFAS” under the TSCA
Networking Luncheon for Speakers and Delegates
Sponsored by
State Regulators Roundtable: Insights from Key State Environmental Agencies on the Latest PFAS Rulemaking Initiatives Coming Down the Pike
Shawn M. LaTouretteCommissionerNew Jersey Department of Environmental Protection
Tracy KellyPFAS Program Coordinator, Bureau of Remediation and Waste ManagementMaine Department of Environmental Protection
Katrina LassiterHazardous Waste and Toxics Reduction Program ManagerWashington State Department of Ecology
Katrina KesslerCommissionerMinnesota Pollution Control Agency
Joaquin EsquivelChairCalifornia State Water Resources Control Board
Patrick FosterDeputy Commissioner for Environmental Remediation and Materials ManagementNew York State Department of Environmental Conservation
Thomas LeePartner and PFAS Team LeaderBryan Cave Leighton Paisner LLP
Afternoon Break
Lori LeskinPartnerArnold & Porter
Seth MailhotPartnerHusch Blackwell
Steven SirosPartner, Co-Chair of Environmental Health and Safety PracticeJenner & Block
Manufacturers, distributors, and retailers of consumer products across a broad spectrum of industries are now being impacted by laws regulating PFAS, with over 100 PFAS-related regulatory policies in place across nearly 25 U.S. states. The dangers for these companies continue to escalate as states are creating new and inconsistent laws, and the penalties and litigation risks for non-compliance can be substantial. This panel will analyze:
- The most critical state-by-state PFAS laws to be aware of, including those relating to:
- PFAS in packaging, containers and food wrappers
- PFAS in cosmetics
- Product labeling and disclosures
- Bans on the intentional addition of PFAS
- Thresholds for the unintentional addition of PFAS
- Navigating discrepancies in state PFAS testing standards, compliance timelines and penalties for non-compliance
- Strategies for developing a cross-state PFAS compliance strategy
Looking Beyond PFOA and PFOS: A Focus Session on Additional PFAS Which May Be the Next Target for Regulators and the Plaintiffs’ Bar
Paul LaFataPartnerDechert LLP
Laura HammargrenShareholderGreenberg Traurig, LLP
While PFOA and PFOS are the two most widely used PFAS, there are thousands of other PFAS chemicals present throughout the United States. What’s more, the EPA has indicated its intention to add additional PFAS chemicals to the CERCLA hazardous substances list. This panel will reconcile the vast universe of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances and forecast which may be the next target for regulation and litigation.
Networking Cocktail Reception
Sponsored by
Day 2
May 31, 2024
Lana RowenkoPartnerKelley Drye & Warren LLP
Join us for a case study of the recent, historic PFAS settlements with 3M and Dupont. Our panelists will analyze significant rulings and key takeaways from these litigations and settlements and provide insights on how they may impact future actions against PFAS chemical manufacturers.
Morning Coffee Break
Examining Emerging Trends in PFAS Litigation Against “Downstream” Manufacturers, Distributors and Retailers of PFAS-Containing Products
Suzanne GalvinPartnerThompson Coburn LLP
Marchello GrayPartnerHollingsworth LLP
Shannon McClure RobertsPartnerReed Smith
Marina SchwartzCounselDechert LLP
As PFAS litigation continues to ramp up, we are now seeing the plaintiff bar shifting their focus to second, third, and fourth “tiers” of defendants, as primary defendants (like direct manufacturers of PFAS chemicals) are becoming insolvent and seeking bankruptcy protections.
This panel will examine:
- The different trends in litigation and settlements against “downstream users of PFAS” – such as businesses involved in the manufacturing and sale of PFAS-containing products
- What kinds of claims are being brought under what theories against what industries?
- Examining the latest creative ways plaintiffs are bringing lawsuits under theories of:
- Consumer fraud / false advertising
- Personal injury
- Medical monitoring
- Strategies for preventing, combatting and defending these lawsuits
- What does the future litigation landscape look like and things businesses can do now to avoid being a class action target
Lessons from Across the Pond: Examining Europe’s Latest Actions to Regulate PFAS and Critical Takeaways for the U.S.
Valentina BertatoPolicy OfficerEuropean Commission, DG Environment
Martin AhlhausPartnerProduktkanzlei
Mercedes Marquez-CamachoTeam Leader, Restriction Opinion Making, Risk ManagementEuropean Chemicals Agency (ECHA)
Taking a look at the latest regulatory initiatives in Europe to restrict certain PFAS compounds
- Examining what is in the EU’s PFAS REACH Proposal (Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals)
- Analyzing the proposal to ban PFAS under REACH
- Analyzing the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA)’s proposal to ban PFAS
- Understanding how this ban would impact the supply chains and customer expectations of companies around the world
- Forecasting whether current EU movements could serve as precedent for future regulations in the US and across the globe
Networking Luncheon
Minimizing PFAS Risks in Manufacturing Practices, Supply Chain Management and Sourcing from Overseas Suppliers
Thomas BrugatoOf CounselCovington & Burling LLP
Guy R. TemplePartnerReinhart Boerner Van Deuren s.c.
- Developing and implementing a complete compliance audit to best assess and mitigate areas of potential concern for PFAS liability in your company’s operations
- Evaluating your organizations current and historical operations for material sourcing, facility operations, and supply chain management to determine whether PFAS entered your operations, intentionally or otherwise
- Identifying data gaps and remedying those gaps
- Prioritizing the most significant risks to your business, keeping in mind future regulatory and market considerations
- Developing a mitigation plan to address your company’s most material risks
- Understanding how to best balance transparency and confidentiality during this process
Heather A. RichardsonPartnerThompson Hine LLP
Timothy J. BergerePartnerArmstrong Teasdale LLP
- Understanding the full scope of responsibilities and liabilities that are at play for entities engaged in the purchase, sale, transfer, merger or absorption of a business or property with ties to PFAS
- Analyzing how to hedge against PFAS risks in these types of transactions
- Identifying best practices for negotiations and transactional due diligence to minimize PFAS risks and potential liabilities
Afternoon Break
Tamara BrunoPartnerPillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
Joseph EnglertPartnerMcGuireWoods LLP
- Assessing the various insurance-related implications triggered by PFAS exposure
- Examining different insurance coverage options to protect against losses stemming from enforcement or lawsuits for alleged PFAS contamination
- Addressing recent strides taken by insurers to enact PFAS-specific exclusions which would carve out coverage for PFAS-related issues